As we get deeper into the concepts of segmentation,
differentiation and positioning, it just becomes more and more evident as to
how complex a subject this can be. In today’s extremely fast moving world,
there is a lot that can be lost if we focus very narrowly on small core
segments, as the user preferences can change very quickly and might spell doom
for the entire business. At the same time, if you can be in the same frequency
as the customers and adapt your offerings to match the changing user
preferences, you will end up creating a very loyal customer following.
Apple
seems to be extremely successful in this endeavor. Their innovation and
attention to quality has made them one of the most successful brands with a
very loyal segment. But something in the article. “The Greatest Comeback Story Of All Time: How Apple Went
From Near Bankruptcy To Billions In 13 Years” (http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-comeback-story-2010-10#2010-the-year-of-the-ipad-14)
caught my attention. It said: “Innovation doesn't require
focus groups. Steve Jobs doesn't believe in asking customers their opinions.
You can develop products people will want before they even know they want it.
Sometimes, you can know customers better than they know themselves.” The first lesson that
I learned in Marketing is all about knowing your customer. The immediate
thoughts that come to our mind is to conduct survey and have constant dialogues
with the customers so that we know what they want. But in reading this, in
contrast, it makes me think that, it is not sufficient to know what your
customers want, you should be capable of anticipating their needs, even before
the customers know that they have such a need. This is indeed powerful and goes
a long way to explain Apple’s market leadership position.
One of the most
important aspects in marketing is the customer perception. As Rory Sutherland explains in his talk
as well as shared in a previous video, we could serve the same wine at
different prices and the consumers would enjoy the costlier wine more, just because
it was priced higher. Recently, Apple had issues with the maps that
they launched with the Iphone5. This proves that even the giants can falter and
make mistakes. But what is more important is to acknowledge the mistake, take
responsibility, communicate immediately to the consumers, apologize and
ultimately learn from these mistakes. Attached
is a link to the letter from Tim Cook, Apple’s CEO, apologizing for Apple’s mistake.
http://www.apple.com/letter-from-tim-cook-on-maps/. Also including an excerpt from a Bloomberg article on how
Apple may benefit from this mistake- “Cook was still apologizing a few weeks
ago when he told
Bloomberg. "We set out to give the customer something to provide a better
experience. And the truth is it didn’t live up to our expectations. We screwed up."
There's a concept in psychology called the "pratfall effect." Put
simply, we like competent people more than incompetent people, but the people
we like best are competent people who occasionally falter. The classic pratfall
experiment shows how individuals find a competent person who spills coffee on
himself more attractive than a competent person without slippery fingers. So Apple Maps
may enable Apple Inc. to benefit from the pratfall effect. “
The full article
can be found at http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-12-13/how-apple-will-benefit-from-its-miserable-maps-failure.html
In short, Apple is perceived
as a high quality brand, one that strives hard for quality and customer
satisfaction. Based on that, the customer will be okay to overlook a few issues or errors, but other players in the space who are not perceived the same by the
consumer may not be that lucky!
Thanks for the article. I have not heard of the "pratfall" effect. But it makes perfect sense. I think it is interesting to consider how we now treat Brands like friends. We forgive the occasional transgression because people are people and subject to failure. Companies are groups of people and sometimes they mess up too.
ReplyDelete